Video - The Great Debate: Free Will vs. Determinism

As we delve into the philosophical concept of moral responsibility, we are faced with a fundamental question that has perplexed scholars and thinkers for centuries - do we truly possess free will, or are our actions predetermined by external factors beyond our control? On one hand, proponents of determinism argue that every event, including human actions, is ultimately determined by causes external to the agent's will. This viewpoint challenges the notion of individual autonomy and raises doubts about the existence of personal responsibility. However, advocates of free will assert that humans have the capacity to make choices independently of external influences, thus attributing moral responsibility to individuals. These contrasting perspectives create a thought-provoking debate, prompting us to question the nature of our decisions and the implications they have on our ethical accountability. While the resolution of this philosophical quandary remains elusive, the exploration of free will versus determinism invites us to reflect on the complexity of human agency and the profound implications it carries in our understanding of morality and accountability.